Re: Inverted uterus

From: Pat Sonnenstuhl (webmidwife1@home.com)
Mon Mar 15 08:20:12 1999


Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

My original point precisely. One doing deliveries should be familiar enough with what an Inverted Uterus is so that they can act in a timely manner. Thus my concern that the FP mentioned didn't recognize what he had.

Braun, R. Daniel wrote: >
> R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG
> Clinical Professor
> Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
> Indiana U. School of Medicine
> Indianapolis, IN
>
> Questions:
> 1) How often have people seen this in primips - I have only had 2 in
> practice so far and they have both been in primips.
>
> This is usually related to implantation site more than anything
> else. A perfect fundal implantation is all that is required to have it.
>
> 2) All present at the delivery deny there was significant traction
> on
> the cord. How often have you seen this without identifiable risk
> factors at delivery?
>
> Doesn't need traction on cord. This is one of those old wives tales.
>
> 3) What would you qoute for recurrence risk?
>
> Slim to none.
>
> 4) Appart from awareness, vigilance, and basically hands off the
> placenta and cord - what else would you recommend in any future
> pregnancy/delivery?
>
> See above.
>
> 5) Any other comments?
>
> It happens. All persons doing deliveries should know about inverted
> uterus and how to immediately replace it. The morbidity of inverted uterus
> is directly related to delay in replacement. The difficulty in replacement
> also increases as time goes on. The worst one I ever had was a lady
> transferred in by a GP(in those days it was GP) It was 6 hours since she had
> delivered. We had to put her to sleep and do a laparotomy. The diagram in
> Williams Obstetrics is 100% accurate. It looks like a hole where the fundus
> ought to be with the tubes and rounds disappearing into it. We were able to
> then grab the rounds and pull it up.
> The section on this in Williams Obstetrics is excellent.
>
> John
>
> --
> J.G.M.Robertson MD, 109-9181 Main St. Chilliwack, B.C. V2P 4M9,
> Canada
> (604) 793-9988 e-mail john.robertson@obgyn.net
> Who is wise and understanding among you? Let him show it by his
> good life,
> by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom. James 3 vs
> 13, NIV





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:31:00 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.