|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: FRI. gestational age; finalFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comWed Dec 30 22:52:20 1998
In a message dated 12/30/98 7:11:10 PM, sanchez-ramos@worldnet.att.net writes: <<We should have paid attention to Kathi Wilson and read Grimes' article in Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:623-5. "The case against using ordinal numbers for gestational age" It sorts out, indirectly, the discussion we were having: using ordinal vs cardinal numbers in measuring gestational age. I recommend you and others read it.>> Hmmmmm, is that why gynecologists cut the cardinal ligament and not the ordinal ligament? It would be 1 cm too high???? (They'd get all the ureters...) Joe P.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:29:53 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.