-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: gestational age; final From: Kathi Wilson, BHSc, RM (wilsonk@gtn.net) Wed Dec 30 21:14:55 1998 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Robert J. Woolley: "Re: "Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease"" Previous message: Rafael Haciski, MD: "FRI - Imponderables" In reply to: Luis Sanchez-Ramos: "gestational age; final" At Wed, 30 Dec 1998, Luis Sanchez-Ramos wrote: > >Peter Wein; > >We should have paid attention to Kathi Wilson and read Grimes' article >in Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:623-5. "The case against using ordinal >numbers for gestational age" It sorts out, indirectly, the discussion we >were having: using ordinal vs cardinal numbers in measuring gestational >age. I recommend you and others read it. Thanks! :^) -- Kathi Wilson BHSc RM Thames Valley Midwives London, Ontario, Canada mailto:wilsonk@gtn.net Next message: Robert J. Woolley: "Re: "Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease"" Previous message: Rafael Haciski, MD: "FRI - Imponderables" In reply to: Luis Sanchez-Ramos: "gestational age; final"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:29:53 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.