-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Definition of term From: Tim or Jude Kurokawa (jkuro@midrivers.com) Wed Dec 30 19:03:02 1998 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Tim or Jude Kurokawa: "Re: "Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease"" Previous message: RModugno@aol.com: "Re: Maternal floor infarction of the placenta" Maybe in reply to: Peter Wein: "Definition of term" Next in thread: Kathi Wilson, BHSc, RM: "Re: RCT supports expectant management 42 wks" No, I don't think this is a personal quirk. I've read that particular way of dating asian baby's age many times . Think I first read it in several of the Pearl Buck stories when I was a kid. Jude -----Original Message----- From: William D. McIntosh, MD <wdmcintoshmd@pol.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <ob-gyn-l@talk.obgyn.net> Date: Wednesday, December 30, 1998 6:51 PM Subject: Re: Definition of term >I once worked with a Vietnamese woman who explained that the date of >birth was considered the 1st birthday to allow for the time since >conception. I don't know if this was a cultural thing, or just her >personal quirk. > >William D. McIntosh, MD >Clarksville, TN > >In the last 4 years I've had a >> handful of patients--all foreign, and (if memory serves) mostly Asian and >> Eastern Bloc--who, while agreeing we have the birthdate right, say that their >> age is one year different from how we have it. I've never understood this, but >> haven't spent much time arguing the point, since that's not exactly the best way >> to start a new relatinoship. But this discussion makes me wonder if some areas >> of the world really do count it that way: you're considered "1" from birth to >> your first birthday, "2" for the next year, etc. >> >> Anybody else ever run into this? Next message: Tim or Jude Kurokawa: "Re: "Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease"" Previous message: RModugno@aol.com: "Re: Maternal floor infarction of the placenta" Maybe in reply to: Peter Wein: "Definition of term" Next in thread: Kathi Wilson, BHSc, RM: "Re: RCT supports expectant management 42 wks"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:26:55 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.