|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: gestational age; finalFrom: Peter Wein (p.wein@obsgyn-mercy.unimelb.EDU.AU)Wed Dec 30 18:14:49 1998
At 18:44 30/12/98 -0600, you wrote: >Peter Wein; > >We should have paid attention to Kathi Wilson and read Grimes' article >in Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:623-5. "The case against using ordinal >numbers for gestational age" It sorts out, indirectly, the discussion we >were having: using ordinal vs cardinal numbers in measuring gestational >age. I recommend you and others read it. > >LSR > Just read it and its advice is what we have always done here. We never use ordinal numbers for pregnancy - far too confusing - always talk about completed weeks.
-- Peter Wein
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:29:53 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.