Re: [Re: GEN: Can you envision the existence of a solitary insurer?]

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Wed Dec 16 11:16:58 1998


Organized Medicine? isn't that an oxymoron?????

Art

Happy Holidays

At Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Robert J. Woolley wrote: >
>In message <22954965.3676b2bf@aol.com> writes:
>> In a message dated 12/14/98 4:26:28 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>> wooll005@tc.umn.edu writes:
>>
>> << Is there any reason our patients *shouldn't* resent us if we continue to
>> act to keep medical prices artificially high, at their expense? >>
>>
>> This makes an assumption that medical prices are "artificially high".
>
>I mean higher than unmanipulated market forces would lead to. The medical
>profession has manipulated the market the same way OPEC does: restrict the
>supply to keep prices high. (Limit the number of seats in medical schools,
>require a difficult-to-obtain license to practice medicine, etc.)
>
> By
>> medical prices I don't know what you are including. However, the only
>> component of medical prices over which physicians have control of the actual
>> price, is our fees. We do control the numbers of other services which we
>> order; but not the actual individual test price, which is set by others.
>> Physician fees have been growing at single digits, most recently 4 %.
>
>The total cost of physician services almost exactly 3-fold from 1970 to 1980
>($13.6 billion to $41.9 billion), and tripled again over the next 10 years (to
>$128.8 billion). There was an 11% increase from 1989-1990, and another 10.2%
>from 1990-1991. This is the last year for which I have easily-available data
>(since I'm looking at a 1994 source). If you are correct that it's now 4% per
>year, that's still more than the CPI increase, and such a recent phenomenon that
>it's hardly a point of professional pride.
>
> Drug
>> prices, on the other hand, are growing at rates of 14 to 18 % over the last 5
>> years. Hospital prices are growing at rates of 6 to 12 percent. These
>> statistics are from NIH, consumer price indexes and medical economics
>> magazine.
>
>It is true that every major sector of health care has had costs increase faster
>than inflation. I'm not sure how that answers my point that our incomes are
>higher because of highly successful manipulation of the market by organized
>medicine in this century.
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bob Woolley
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>St. Paul, Minnesota
>
>"Weapons defend the lives of those who wish to live peacefully,
>and they also on many occasions kill men, not because of any
>wickedness inherent in them but because those who wield them do
>so in an evil way."
>
> -- Giovanni Boccaccio
> "The Decameron"
> c. 1350
>

--
art fougner, md
SonoScan/Genetic Sciences
forest hills, ny
evsono@pipeline.com




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:29:52 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.