Re: AW: Ob-Gyn New Case
From: Dan Logen (pdl@whidbey.net)
Thu Aug 13 09:50:50 1998
Vaginal
--
Dan Logen
Private Practice OB-GYN
Mt. Vernon, WA
----------
> From: Pasqualetti Roberto KSSG_FRA <foa4@ms1.kssg.ch>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <ob-gyn-l@talk.obgyn.net>
> Subject: AW: AW: Ob-Gyn New Case
> Date: Thursday, August 13, 1998 6:34 AM
>
> Vaginal or abdominal scan ?
>
> Roberto
>
> >----------
> >Von: Dan Logen[SMTP:pdl@whidbey.net]
> >Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. August 1998 00:28
> >An: Multiple recipients of list
> >Betreff: Re: AW: Ob-Gyn New Case
> >
> >In this case I did not need a follow-up sono or HCG level, even though
this
> >was her first visit to me. She was 12 weeks from LMP, had about an 8
week
> >size sac, and a 7 week embryo without cardiac motion.
> >Dan Logen
> >Private Practice OB-GYN
> >Mt. Vernon, WA
> >
> >----------
> >> From: Betty Rommel, MD, PhD <mszcynz@is2.nyu.edu>
> >> To: Multiple recipients of list <ob-gyn-l@talk.obgyn.net>
> >> Subject: Re: AW: Ob-Gyn New Case
> >> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 1998 6:56 AM
> >>
> >> At Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Pasqualetti Roberto KSSG_FRA wrote:
> >> >>I do not agree. A good vaginal scan is all is needed to diagnose a
not
> >> >>evolving intrauterin pregnancy. I do not see the point to look for a
> >HCG
> >> >>follow up in 7 days when you can just scan in 3-4 days.
> >>
> >> Ich micht es nicht.
> >>
> >> The Swiss are much better at being neutral than making a convincing
> >> argument. Let's get this straight, your proposing that there is no
> >> point to drawing a tiny little tube of blood to obtain the same info
> >> otherwise obtained by repeatedly and invasively probing my inner
> >> sanctum. How many men would submit to such pretzel logic if the game
> >> were PSA versus rectal sono???
> >>
> >> --
> >> Betty Rommel, MD, PhD
> >
