Re: My case list...

From: Jane Helwig, MD (jane@seasonedsystems.com)
Sat May 30 17:25:58 1998


At Sat, 30 May 1998, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:

>Why did you do that? I can reluctantly agree to managing ectopics by laparoscopy if
>retaining fertility is the issue and the ectopic is small.
>
>But a previously sterilized patient with a large ectopic?

El, in retrospect I certainly wish I had done a laparotomy initially and gotten the thing out with zero blood loss. The cul-de-sac mass looked large on sono, but I have had others that looked large on ultrasound and turned out to be smaller than expected. Diagnostic L/S seemed a reasonable option. Had the ectopic been in the tube, could have done a salpingectomy laparoscopically.

>Approach it as "fetal distress" and you should
>be in the cavity in less then 1 minute through any up and down.

She had 2 previous c/s via the midline incision and a previous open chole, and weighs 280lb. I wanted to minimize enterotomy risk. It may not have taken 5 whole minutes, but it seemed like 5 hours.

>Was this fresh blood?

Yes, absolutely no blood there before it ruptured intraoperatively.

This was an unusual ectopic. . .no bleeding, no abdominal pain (consistent with the ovarian implantation). In fact, the patient presented because of carpal tunnel syndrome and a very astute nurse-practitioner elicited a history of missed menses and previous BTL, then got pregnancy test which was positive and sent her to us.

>Yes indeed. Blood is one of the most dangerous products we are allowed
>to prescribe and one should not treat the lab result but the patient
>with it.

Bravo.

Thanks, El!

--
Jane Helwig, MD
Private practice
Nassawadox, VA




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:27:51 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.