![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: anovulationFrom: Robert J. Woolley (wooll005@tc.umn.edu)Sun Mar 22 12:21:43 1998
In message <borspyAOwVF1EwUw@mgriff22.demon.co.uk> writes: > > Unless I've missed something, you haven't proven lack of ovulation - > need progesterone, U/S follicle tracking, temp chart, endo Bx, etc. Progesterone level is drawn but not back from the lab yet. As for the others, I'm certainly willing, but that's exactly one of my questions: is there really any point? That is, isn't anovulation so overwhelmingly likely here that other confirmations are unnecessary?
> > One of my favorite words. Another being "agnogenic." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Woolley -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Paul, Minnesota
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:27:25 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.