|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Microscopic HematuriaFrom: Laurie Lovely, M.D. (llovely@med.unc.edu)Mon Mar 16 15:22:55 1998
At Mon, 16 Mar 1998, Robert J Woolley wrote: > >FWIW, a false-negative microscopic exam is much more likely than a >false-positive dipstick reaction, so the dipstick not confirmed by micro >should still be assumed to be true micro hematuria. (What you do about >this is, however, a thornier question.) That's counterintuitive. Can you explain?
-- Laurie Lovely, MD RE fellow, UNC-Chapel Hill
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:23:41 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.