Re: "98d DMPA cycle" source needed; N so far

From: Tessler (tessler@frontiernet.net)
Thu Feb 19 08:19:06 1998


What I wrote matches the notes I made and my recollection. Unfortunately, I did not copy the article and can't swear that it wasn't a typo. However, I suspect the discrepancy between our concept of physiology and the labels used in the study can be explained by the use of estradiol and progesterone measurements as proxies for luteal and follicular function. In support of this explanation, I have an article on DMPA pharmacokinetics that says of Fotherby's study, "In this study the MPA levels fell more rapidly than in the other two studies, and the progesterone levels initially rose about 3.5 months after an injection of 150 mg of DMPA -- much earlier than reported in the other two studies." (Mishell, D.R. Jr. (1996). Pharmacokinetics of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 41 (5 supp), 381-390.)

Regards,

Patti Tessler, RN, Family Nurse Practitioner Orange County, New York, USA tessler@frontiernet.net

At 11:03 AM 2/18/98 -0600, "R. Daniel Braun, M.D." <rbraun@iunet.iupui.edu> wrote:

>I find it interesting that Fotherby found reumption of "Luteal" function as
>early as 66 days, but no evidence of "Follicular" function before 104 days.
>I thought a follicle was necessary to lead to Luteal function. Or is this a
>typo?

-----Original Message----- >Fortherby et al. measured plasma estradiol and progesterone as indicators
>of resumption of follicular and luteal activity. Only five (5) women were
>tested after a 150 mg DMPA dose. The ranges in these women were 66 to over
>167 days for resumption of luteal function, and 104 to over 167 days for
>resumption of follicular function. The authors noted that these results
>were preliminary, and referred to a 90 day cycle for reinjection as the
>standard.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:23:21 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.