|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: vasa previaFrom: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)Tue Feb 10 15:17:18 1998
At Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Deborah J. Wage wrote: > >On the subject of vasa previa: > >1. Difficult to diagnosis antenatally, correct? Except with >transvaginal doppler (color flow), correct? > >2. Is present with velementous insertion? > >3. Is there a known etiology, or risk factors for incidence (I am not >aware of any). > >Thanks, > >Deborah Wage, MSN,FNP,CNM 1. yes. also, in cases of 3rd TM bleeding in the absence of placenta previa, a + test for fetal hgb is suggestive of vasa previa. 2. yes. also vessels feeding a succenturiate lobe. 3. besides abnormal placenta, multiple pregnancy. hope this helps. art
-- art fougner, md SonoScan/Genetic Sciences forest hills, ny evsono@pipeline.com
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:23:20 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.