Re: ACOG and labor inductions.

From: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)
Sun Nov 30 15:24:26 1997


Larry Glazerman wrote: >
> In response to several messages about ACOG's stand on labor induction,
> I am quoting (I hope legally, with proper attribution) from ACOG
> Technical Bulletin #217, December 1995:
>
> Indications for inducing labor may include, but are not limited
> to, the following maternal or fetal situations:
... >
> o Logistic factors (eg, risk of rapid labor, distance from hospital, psychosocial indications)
>
> I would interpret this statement to NOT preclude or prohibit "elective" induction, i.e.,
> "An induction performed only for the convenience of the Mother or the Physician".
>
> What do other members think>
>
--

I would interpret that way too.

--
Bernard Cristalli MD CNGOF
AIHP - ACCA
Paris - France
http://www.obgyn.net/corresp/cristalli.htm




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:25:25 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.