![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Retinal detachment (was glaucoma and labor)From: Malcolm Griffiths (Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk)Sat Nov 22 02:53:28 1997
In message <34765AB0.24D2@club-internet.fr>, Bernard Cristalli <bcrist@club-internet.fr> writes >Jorge Carrillo wrote: >> >> Not only glaucoma is controversial between ophtalmologists and obgyn; try to >> put people together regarding miopy and labor. There are no evidence-based >> policies. >> >-- > >Right. Only when there is a history of retinal detachment (RD) it seems >reasonable to avoid efforts during the delivery. As well as when there >are lesions that may lead to this RD. A randomized trial sonds difficult >to be ethical, not to say it would be a *blind* test -/). > Bernard do you have any evidence for this statemetn about RD? It is a generally accepted view but as far as I am aware there is no evidence to support it. There was a short paper in BMJ a few years ago, which surveyed opthalmologists advice on elective assisted delivery or CS vs spont delivery for RD sufferers. The study showed a range of advice and discsussed the evidence for any interference and concluded that there was no evidecne and that there was no basis for interference. About 18mo ago I had a nurse-patient who had had an elective CS in her first pregnancy because of a past history of RD. Her opthalmologist and her then ob/gyn advised CS. Last time around she came to me asking for a trial of VBAC. I copied the BMJ paper to her opthalmologist and asked his comments. He confirmed he had no evidence to say a VBAC was inappropriate. She had a normal vaginal delivery without any problems! Malcolm Griffiths MD,MRCOG,MFFP,Cert.Mgmnt Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Luton & Dunstable Hosp.,UK. Tel: 01582-497459 (office) Fax: 01582-497376 01525-222849 (home) email: Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk http://www.obgyn.net/board/griffith.htm "CLINICAL FREEDOM IS THE LAST REFUGE OF THE CLINICALLY INCOMPETENT!" (Someone [1997])
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:25:24 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.