Re: Partial Mole with Viable Pregnancy?

From: art fougner, md (evsono@pipeline.com)
Mon Nov 10 13:34:17 1997


At Mon, 10 Nov 1997, Michael J. Wolpmann, M.D. wrote: >
>Recently asked this question:
>32 Y/O with partial mole on U/S at 16 weeks, viable appearing infant
>with no 'visible' anomalies.
>Can she take it to term?
>
>Think this might be possible with twin gestation but have never heard of
>it. Risk of metastatic disease, other sequela would seem to make this a
>bad idea.
>Any thoughts on this? Thanks.
>
>Michael
>
>--
>michael j. wolpmann, md
>

hi

here i would defer to the oncologist but it is important to know whether you are dealing with a twin gestation ( one nl with nl placenta and one complete mole) or whether you are dealing with a partial mole (incomplete molar placenta with fetus.)with case #2 patient should most likely have karyotyping because of the incidence of triploidy. i once saw a lady with case #1 who developed floridly sever pre-eclampsia at 19 weeks. was a sad case indeed. good luck!

art

--
art fougner, md
SonoScan/Genetic Sciences
forest hills, ny
evsono@pipeline.com




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:22:02 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.