Re: (no subject)

From: rbraun@champion.iupui.edu
Tue Nov 4 19:03:03 1997


GOlly, I find myself actually agreeing with Bob Woolley on a managed health care issue. We need less legislation on health care not more. We have reached the state where whenever ones ox gets gored, one runs to the legislature for relief. Then we get more laws and more paperwork and everybody suffers. Just think, we have already had one surgical procedure made illegal by congress. The president didn't sign it so it isn't the law yet. Next year they may make CABG an illegal procedure. What then all you big guys with angina???

--
R. Daniel Braun, MD

On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Robert J. Woolley wrote:

> In message <199711042045.OAA07942@talk.obgyn.net> writes: > > At Tue, 4 Nov 1997, DuBose, Terry wrote: > > > > > >An article on the frontpage of the New York Times today might be of > > >interest to many on these lists. It discusses current events around > > >regulation of health care. Seems the insurance industry lobbyists are > > >organizing to oppose consumer driven regulations to set some minimum > > >standards for health care. > > >Peace, Terry J. DuBose, M.S., > > As well they should oppose it. Legislatures trying to decide what health > insurers should offer is going to be a disaster. I understand that Minnesota has > more required-coverage mandates than any other state--something like 30 so far. > These include things like a wig for chemotherapy patients, laser treatment for > port-wine stains, etc. The latest big-ticket item was bone-marrow transplant for > breast cancer, which is of unproven value, but a major expense. > > What incentive does a legislator have to say "no" to a vocal constiuent > group--even a small one--that asks for just one more mandated-coverage clause? > Citizens don't typically blame the legislator for rising premium rates--they > blame the insurer. The legislator has everything to gain and nothing to lose, so > the mandates keep piling up. Not in any logical order, but by how much noise a > disease-specific advocacy group can yell about it. Would anything less happen at > the federal level? > > It's one of the most irraitional ways I can think of to decide what a > health-care insurance policy will cover. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bob Woolley > St. Paul, Minnesota > > "There is such a thing as giving the devil his due, > but one needn't tip him handsomely as well." > > --Lee Allred >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:25:22 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.