Re: Inflammatory Pap

From: rbraun@champion.iupui.edu
Fri Oct 31 14:30:13 1997


I would do a wet prep and if positive, treat the infection. If negative. do an annual pap. If the pathologist thought there was any possibility at all of any kind of dysplastic lesion, he would have invoked the GODDESS. That is right ASCUS. Since he didn't, I'll bet you are OK. If you are worried at all, call the pathologist and ask him what the hell he is talking about when he says inflammation.

--
R. Daniel Braun, MD

On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Robert J Woolley wrote:

> Case for your collective wisdom: > > 28 year-old medical student, completely asymptomatic throughout the events > below, married and monogamous now (though I didn't ask about previous # of > partners). Assume her to be reliable for whatever follow-up you recommend. > > 5/95: Routine Pap, normal. > > 4/96: Pap with reading "atypical benign (020); Bethesda system--benign > pathology", with comment "Inflammation." No treatment instituted. Advised > follow-up > in 6 months to repeat. > > 12/96: Pap with precisely the same reading as before. > > QUESTION #1: Would you recommend, at this point: > > A) Colposcopy > B) Empiric treatment of some sort > C) Repeat Pap in 1 year > D) Repeat Pap sooner (e.g., 4-6 months) > > ? > > I chose D. Which gets us to: > > 4/97: Normal Pap. > > QUESTION #2: > > Would you now continue more frequent Paps, revert to annual schedule, or > do something else? > > (Disclaimer: My medical director is disagreeing with my recommendation > after the second "inflammation" pap--thinks colposcopy should have been > done then. I obviously disagree, but I doubt that either of us can point > to any hard data to support our positions.) >





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:24:54 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.