Re: "Chaparone" To have or not to have?

From: dahmd (dahmd@gate.net)
Mon Oct 27 21:17:52 1997


Philip Suarez wrote:

> IMHO it is exceedingly unethical, regardless of the genetics of the
> practitioner, to perform gynecologic exams without a chaperone.
> Period.

Philip-

I respectfully disagree. I find nothing unethical about an unchaperoned exam. Rather, I find that it protects *me* from an unwarranted accusation by an unstable patient or by a patient who does not understand the format of a basic pelvic exam. As I have stated here before, I know of a 60ish year-old patient who falsely accused her previous Ob/Gyn of being "perverted" because he performed a brief digital rectal exam during an annual examination! With a chaperon(e) present this misunderstanding is much less likely to occur.

Ashley D. Ashley Hill, M.D. dahmd@gate.net Orlando, FL





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:24:53 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.