-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula From: Dr. A. Hensenne (cdtg@skynet.be) Sun Aug 31 17:22:22 1997 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: tradmidwifery@juno.com: "Re: [2]: new case" Previous message: Rjwoolley@aol.com: "Re: [2]: new case" Maybe in reply to: Dr Ron Jewell: "Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula" """I think, that the condition of the recto-vaginal septum after repair of a fistula is probably not terribly different from that after repair of a 4th degree tear. ..." I disagree with you. Dr A.Hensenne cdtg@skynet.be 72 rue verte 4100 Seraing (LIEGE) - Belgium - Gynécologie médicale et chirurgicale -- ---------- : De : Rjwoolley@aol.com : A : Multiple recipients of list <ob-gyn-l@talk.obgyn.net> : Objet : Re: Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula : Date : lundi 1 septembre 1997 00:03 : : If there has been an effective repair of an urinary or fecal : incontinence that was previously invalidating I am absolutely *for* a : cesarean. In fact it's only a matter of informed consent. So if the : informed woman prefers a VD... : ********* : : But Ron's point (if I may be so bold as to speak for him for the moment; and : why not? After all, I've agreed with him 3 times in the last 24 hours, which : is some sort of record, and should probably cause one or the other of us to : re-examine his positoins....) was, I think, that the condition of the : recto-vaginal septum after repair of a fistula is probably not terribly : different from that after repair of a 4th degree tear. So if you advocate : automatic C-section in the former case, it's logical that you should in the : latter as well. Do you? If not, why not? Next message: tradmidwifery@juno.com: "Re: [2]: new case" Previous message: Rjwoolley@aol.com: "Re: [2]: new case" Maybe in reply to: Dr Ron Jewell: "Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula" Next in thread: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula" Reply: Garry E. Siegel, M.D.: "Re: Delivery mode in a patient with a previous rectovaginal fistula"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:23:16 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.