|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: 19 yr old with vaginismusFrom: Robert J. Woolley (wooll005@gold.tc.umn.edu)Tue Aug 5 01:03:11 1997
In message <Pine.SOL.3.91.970804202955.23500A-100000@steele> writes: > > I like the idea of > general anesthesia. However, her body will still > experience the invasive procedure despite the anesthesia and this might > compound the original problem of vaginismus.
> Please explain this. It makes no sense to me. The brain is what perceives; assuming it is sufficiently deeply anesthetized, and no physical damage is done during the exam that would continue to produce noxious stimuli after the procedure is over, how could the exam worsen the vaginismus? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Woolley -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Paul, Minnesota
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:20:44 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.