![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: ECC, Cones, and in situ adeno ca of the cervixFrom: Bernard Cristalli (bcrist@club-internet.fr)Sun Jul 13 13:52:39 1997
Geffrey H. Klein, MD wrote: > > Two articles from July's Green Journal caught my eye.. > > "... conservative management of adenocarcinoma in situ in women > interested in reproductive preservation should be undertaken with > trepidation, even if both cone margins and ECC are uninvolved, because > there is no characteristic presently available that can be used to evaluate > residual or recurrent endocervical disease reliably." > and > "Patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ upon conization who are not interested in childbearing should undergo a hysterectomy..." > > Any thoughts? --
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:20:20 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.