![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Sacral colpopexy vs. vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixationFrom: Malcolm Griffiths (malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk)Fri Jun 20 16:43:42 1997
In message <199706191255.HAA20747@warhol.ICSI.Net>, "Philip Suarez, M.D." <philip@ICSI.Net> writes >Folks, > > Some time ago there was a discussion regarding the advantages of >the abdominal sacral colpopexy over the vaginal sacrospinous ligament >fixation. Could someone direct me to the references supporting this >opinion? > I'de be interested in relevant refs also :-) Malcolm Griffiths MD,MRCOG,MFFP,Cert.Mgmnt Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Luton & Dunstable Hosp., LU6 2DT, UK. Tel: 01582-497459 (office) Fax: 01582-497376 01525-222849 (home) email: Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk http://www.obgyn.net/board/griffith.htm "It is dangerous to be right on a subject on which the established authorities are wrong." (Voltaire) "But sometimes it's fun :-)" (Griffiths)
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Mar 2 05:21:23 2010 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.