Re: >Repugnant ethics< thread Wooley/Bello

From: Robert J. Woolley (wooll005@gold.tc.umn.edu)
Wed Apr 23 16:36:29 1997


In message <199704232106.QAA05978@talk.obgyn.net> writes: > At Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Robert J. Woolley wrote:
>
> >
> >Are you saying, Dr. Braun, that you, too, would favor a person of a
> particular
> >race or sex on the basis of that characteristic over another candidate
> lacking
> >the "desired" characteristic?
> >
>
> If you have two *male* applicants for the same position, and both are
> equally qualified, you have to choose one based on something, whether
> it's (1) personality, (2) looks, (3) clothing, whatever. In other
> words, you have to discriminate between the two applicants. That may be
> shallow, but it's not bigoted.

Agreed. Obviously, subjective, intangibles play a role in most job selection. It's just that we, as a society, have collectively decided that you may *not* use *some* characteristics, including race, sex, religion, etc. Well, when I say "we" I obviously mean a majority, not every individual. Dr. Bello, e.g., is one who has indicated his dissent from this consensus.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Woolley

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
St. Paul, Minnesota

I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives. -- Tolstoy





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:19:24 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.