|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: hysteroscopy:diagnostic vs therapeuticFrom: mark decker (mdecker@nconnect.net)Fri Jan 31 01:32:07 1997
At 10:46 PM 1/30/97 -0600, you wrote: >I was present in one case that changed from a smaqll loss in the I&O to >greater than 3000 cc loss. The results were the same. pt did well SHe >ended up accepting a vaginal hysterectomy rather than reop with myoma >resection We could not explain the loss no reason perforation, major >bleeeding etc. We are looking at the new measuring devices to help keep >a more accurate I&O to avoid this problem. >Myer > >Myer S. Bornstein, M.D.,F.A.C.O.G. >Chairman Department Obsterics and Gynecology >Morton Hospital and Medical Center >Taunton, MA 02780 thanks for your reply. My patient has a grade I-II uterine prolapse but minimal a/p laxness and no attributable symptoms. I will be explaing that myoma removal is a greater risk for hyponatremia..though in her case I doubt it would happen again. I'll see what happens..bleeding and dysmenorrhea and then cover it all with her. Mark -- mark decker md obgyn: midwest multi-specialty clinic drug of choice: Harley-Davidson
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:20:46 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.