![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: recommendations for positive staph aureusFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comThu Jan 30 13:58:16 1997
<<Would anyone recommend treating a cervical culture that is positive for staph aureus in a patient at 26 2/7 weeks gestation with confirmed PPROM. She was initially treated prophylactically with ampicillin for unknown Beta Strep status.>> Yes indeedy! Staph aureus is a dangerous pathogen, probably more dangerous in this circumstance than GC. I would use a cephalosporin initially, assuming the bug is sensitive, since those are generally safe for the fetus. In the case of MRSA, I would feel strongly enough about this to use vancomycin (second choice, perhaps clindamycin...) but consult local ID people if you find MRSA. Joe P.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:20:46 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.