Re: SPO update - Ca++

From: Arthur W. Curtis, Jr. (artcurtis@juno.com)
Sun Jan 26 12:03:55 1997


On Sun, 26 Jan 1997 00:27:58 -0600 "Kenneth J. Moise" <kmoise@bcm.tmc.edu> writes: >
>To all subscribers,
>
>Just returned from the 20th annual meeting of the Society of Perinatal
>Obstetricians and here is my overall summary of the "hot stuff":
>
>1) NIH muti-centered trial: Ca++ does not prevent PIH in nulliparous
>patients.
>
>Ken Moise
>Baylor College of Medicine

--

Thanks for the interesting update. Too bad Ca++ does not prevent PIH. However does Ca++ reduce either the severity of (hard to measure) or the frequency of PIH? Probably not?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Arthur Curtis, MD FACOG Worcester, MA ArtCurtis@Juno.com





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:18:26 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.