![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: What would you do, new caseFrom: Robert J. Woolley (wooll005@gold.tc.umn.edu)Sat Jan 11 11:58:31 1997
In message <Pine.HPP.3.95.970110230045.3708B-100000@champion.iupui.edu> writes: > I thought that the definition of pre-eclampsia is "The presence of 2 of > the following 3 factors after 20 weeks of gestation due only to the > influence of pregnancy. > 1. Hypertension 140/90 or a rise of 30/15 on 2 occasions 6 hours apart. > 2. Proteinuria 300 mg/24 hours or 1-2+ on 2 dipsticks 6 hours apart. > 3. Edema 5 # wt gain in one week or Facial and Hand edema. > > Or has it changed in the 20th edition of Williams which I haven't seen > yet? > By the above criteria this patient has mild pre-eclampsia IMHO Going through my 1993 list of 6 different sets of diagnostic criteria, this patient meets only the last one, because all the others (including Williams, Danforth, ACOG, and the WHO) require 2+ or more proteinuria. Lest anyone think that insisting on 1+ vs 2+ dipstick protein is quibbling over trivia, please remember that there is a 3-fold difference in these levels, quantitatively. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Woolley -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Paul, Minnesota
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:20:44 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.