![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Episiotomy vs No EpisiotomyFrom: Robert J. Woolley (wooll005@gold.tc.umn.edu)Mon Dec 30 22:41:50 1996
In message <961230222902_1410629222@emout14.mail.aol.com> writes: > Wasn't there a series (in the last year) of excellent review articles in the > Survey about short and long term advantages of reduction in episiotomy rate > and allowing labial lacerations and first degree lacerations instead of > routine episiotomies? Seemed very compelling literature Why, thank you! (I wrote them.) It was actually one long article, which the journal broke into two so they could meet their promised number of CME articles. I'm glad *somebody* read them.
(but then again, I
> read Mac computer magazines and Star Trek books when I'm not "doing" My preferred reading material, also. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Woolley -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- St. Paul, Minnesota
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:20:21 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.