|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Episiotomy vs No EpisiotomyFrom: Bernard Cristalli (bclaure@mailhost.grolier.fr)Mon Dec 30 09:56:16 1996
Myer.S.Bornstein@massmed.org, M.D. wrote: > > Bob: I read your article on the advantages / disadvantages of > episiotomy. Your summary shows no difference in episiotomies/1-2 degree > laceration in the function of the pelvic floor. We are being told by > DMA, through our review agency MassPro, that we must decrease our > episiotomy rate, because there is better invervation later on. > Comments please. > Myer Just a word, A belgian article a few years ago showed, on a large sample, that episiotomies were more likely associated with heavy lacerations. Bias: more episio. when the babies are big?
-- Bernard Cristalli MD CNGOF Paris - France
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:20:21 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.