![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
A case-reply from MG ( UK )From: Malcolm Griffiths (Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk)Wed Dec 4 18:13:29 1996
In message <199612011953.TAA14877@cariari.ucr.ac.cr>, Sing-Hung Chang <changl@cariari.ucr.ac.cr> writes >17 y/o, primigravida, 41 3/7 wks, adequate prenatal care, came to the >hospital claiming 3 days of absent fetal movements. She had only slight >irregular uterine contractions, no history of watery discharge. Her >examination revealed: FH 35 cm, elevated uterine tone, FHR 152 bpm on >Doppler, with desaccelerations (down to 60 bpm). Upon admission, a NST was >reactive, adequate variability, showing some cord compression pattern, but >without any real desacceleration on a 30-minute recording. The US revealed >severe oligohydramnios (AFI = 2.0), BPP=4/6. EFW = 3600 g. >Her cervical conditions were 3 cm dilated, 70% effaced. Vertex, station - >2, intact membranes. The pelvis was clinically assessed as adequate for >vaginal delivery. > >Question: Is amnioinfusion + labor induction absolutely indicated in this >setting? Why or why not? > UK experience of amnioinfusion is not positive, but I appreciate others experience is better. At this gestation I would be thinking about induction anyway. However I would be almost expecting the CTG to get worse leading me to ( ? inevitably ? ) CS. I certainly wouldn't sit on her ! My assumption would be either oligohydramnios due to SROM or feto-placental problems - neither being good news !! It may be that someone will say that amnio-infusion will avoid the cord compression that will lead me to diagnose fetal distress, thereby avoiding a CS.
--
Malcolm Griffiths MD,MRCOG,MFFP,Cert.Mgmnt
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Luton & Dunstable Hosp.,UK.
Tel: 01582-497459 (office)
01525-222849 (home)
Fax: 01582-497424
email: Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:18:00 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.