Re: A case

From: John Robertson (jgmr@unixg.ubc.ca)
Tue Dec 3 14:18:08 1996


---------- > From: Robert J Woolley <wooll005@gold.tc.umn.edu>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <ob-gyn-l@talk.obgyn.net>
> Subject: Re: A case
> Date: Monday, December 02, 1996 1:24 PM
>
> Hmmm. I don't recall hearing this definition of "postdates" before. Any
> published source for this?

I thought I did, but I don't. It is certainly possible that it is something taught in residency that I did not check in the literature. I am still looking.

> But perhaps you could find and quote the article where the authors make
> the "recommendation" you allege. I am highly skeptical of your claim,
> frankly.

NEJM June 11 1992 pp1587 - 1592

In the abstract: Conclusions: In post-term pregnancy, the induction of labour results in a lower rate of cesarean section than serial antenatal monitoring ...

in the discussion: If anything therefore, a policy of inducing labor in post-term pregnancy may decrease the perinatal mortality rate.

In a SOGC Committee Opinion (simmilar to ACOG committee opinions) (Principle author Mary Hannah, same as the NEJM article)

Summary: Women who reach 41 weeks gestation should be appropriately counselled regarding the higher risk to themselves and to their babies if they should pursue a policy of expectant management. These results suggest that a policy of induction is, in general, to be preferred.

So, does the skeptic counsel his patients that they are at higher risk if they are managed expectantly over 41 weeks?

J.G.M.Robertson MD, 109-9181 Main St. Chilliwack, B.C., Canada, V2P 3M9 (604) 793-9988 e-mail jgmr@unixg.ubc.ca The best we can do for one another is to exchange our thoughts freely; and that, after all, is about all. James A. Froude (1818-1894)





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:18:00 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.