-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Abdominal versus vaginal ultrasound From: DrBryan@aol.com Mon Nov 25 09:03:21 1996 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Lynn D. Montgomery: "Re: OB-GYN-L digest 723" Previous message: DrBryan@aol.com: "Re: IUD in Douglas pouch" Maybe in reply to: dahmd@gate.net: "Abdominal versus vaginal ultrasound" Next in thread: Lynn D. Montgomery: "Re: Abdominal versus vaginal ultrasound" I completely support your position. I can't stand the foley/abd sono approach. it's an income generator. This exam is worthless at 6-7 weeks gestation or sooner. You care about the intrauterine vs. adnexal areas and VAG scan is far superior. Give 'em heck! Bryan Jick, Ob/Gyn Pasadena, CA. Next message: Lynn D. Montgomery: "Re: OB-GYN-L digest 723" Previous message: DrBryan@aol.com: "Re: IUD in Douglas pouch" Maybe in reply to: dahmd@gate.net: "Abdominal versus vaginal ultrasound" Next in thread: Lynn D. Montgomery: "Re: Abdominal versus vaginal ultrasound"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:17:41 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.