|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: recurrent pregnancy lossFrom: R L Meisel (mfm@southwind.net)Thu Oct 24 14:17:54 1996
>> Is anyone aware of studies which examine spontaneous pregnancy loss rates >> (first trimester) as a function of the time interval from a previous first >> trimester loss (either spontaneous or induced)? >> > I have always felt that this came from older literature (pre-ultrasound) >and was a function >of the inability to accurately date the next pregnancy. Interesting I always thought it was a way to reduce the risk of prematurity. ie short interconceptual period. Ric ************************************************* Richard L Meisel, M.D., FACOG Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine UKSM-W Dept of Ob/Gyn (316) 688-7990 3243 E Murdock St., Suite 201 FAX 688-7656 Wichita, Kansas 67208 mfm@southwind.net *************************************************
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:17:30 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.