-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: Cochrane Peer Review From: Malcolm Griffiths (Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk) Tue Jun 4 20:47:34 1996 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: HockIsUs@aol.com: "Re: FETAL DISTRESS" Previous message: dahmd@gate.net: "Re: IUD/Abruption" In reply to: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: Continuous OCP's" Next in thread: OBDocRick@aol.com: "Re: Continuous OCP's" In message <2.2.16.19960604164216.090f3a92@unix.ccc.nottingham.ac.uk>, Jason Gardosi <jason.gardosi@nottingham.ac.uk> writes >The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth database is being quoted increasingly >on this list, Jason, I certainly agree on this one. It is not only the fact that some of the meta-analyses seem to be suspect, but also that if they are not up-adted in the light of subsequnt RCTs then they are quoted as "Gospel", whereas in fac they're "Old Testament". -- Malcolm Griffiths MD,MRCOG,MFFP,Cert.Mgmnt Obstetrician & Gynaecologist Luton & Dunstable Hosp.,UK. Tel: 01582-497459 (office) 01525-222849 (home) Fax: 01582-497424 email: Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk "It is dangerous to be right on a subject on which the established authorities are wrong." (Voltaire) Next message: HockIsUs@aol.com: "Re: FETAL DISTRESS" Previous message: dahmd@gate.net: "Re: IUD/Abruption" In reply to: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: Continuous OCP's" Next in thread: OBDocRick@aol.com: "Re: Continuous OCP's"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:18:44 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.