![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: CauterizationFrom: Dr Antonio Valdez (avaldez@infolnk.net)Wed May 22 21:39:43 1996
At 06:45 PM 5/22/96 -0500, you wrote: >DEar listers > >I am not sure if this word exists, cauterization, but I mean, when we burn >something to heal the lesion. Any way, my question is: > >Lots of ObGyn burn normal ectopic tissue in the cervix claiming that t is a >wound that must be healed before it become a cancer (according to patient's >information), others say that it might be an etilogic factor for deep >dispareunia. I have seen a lot of ectopy in the cervix, I perform pap + colpo, >if things are OK, I do nothing, if the patient has no complains, I do nothing >as well. Am I doing the proper thing? Is ectopy a cause for deep dispareunia? >If the patient has a increased vaginal discharge in these circunstances, would >not be better to insure the patient and wait, instead of burning? > >Thanks > >Ricardo Savaris, MD,MSc, Febrasgo >savaris@vortex.ufrgs.br >Porto Alegre- Brazil > Ricardo: I have the same problem with my patients with cervical ectopia, because they received a lot of bad information about this problem (cancer precursor????) with the economic purpose to apply excesive treatment for that reason, even an hysterectomy!!! Cervical ectopia is a benign transformation of the external cervical epitelium from plane to cilindric and is a normal finding in some situacions like pregnancy, postpartum, hormonal treatment and the frecuency is to high ( 15-85% depends the report) that is not elegyble for treatment. But in some patients, cervical ectopia is associated with chronic and profusse leucorrea, and with postcoital bleeding. So I do the same like you. If the patient is asymptomatic and the ectopia is not so big, I do nothing, and Im sure we are not wrong. And if the patient have some symptoms and the ectopia is big, I treat it. Of course we have to make a diferential diagnosis with cervical cancer and an exofitic cervical condyloma, and make a PAP + Colpo. And I prefered to treat it with cryotherapy than "cauterization" because the first produce a controled 2-3 mm deep lesion.
--
Antonio Valdez-Torres MD FACOG
Hospital Guernika
Cd Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico (...surviving the crisis...)
E-mail : avaldez@infolink.net
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:18:26 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.