|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: NEJM TERMPROMFrom: R. Daniel Braun (rBraun@IUNET.IUPUI.EDU)Fri Apr 26 17:45:12 1996
I think the article you are thinking of was on induction versus observation at 41 weeks with intact membranes. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ R.Daniel Braun,MD "Never frighten a little man. He'll kill Clinical Professor you." Indiana U. School of Medicine Lazarus Long @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>>> <DoctorJoe@aol.com> 04/26/96 10:17am >>> I don't have that right in front of me, but I think it was Hannah et al, which is the Canadian Group Study organization... They compared pg gel versus expectant management... Joe P.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:16:30 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.