Re: 35w diabetic needing less insulin

From: Malcolm Griffiths (Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk)
Mon Mar 25 14:01:56 1996


In message <960324221828_100724.2333_EHU118-1@CompuServe.COM>, STEWART PRINGLE <100724.2333@compuserve.com> writes >Tomorrow we are delivering (by C/S) a 35w diabetic mainly on the grounds that
>her insulin requirements have halved over the last 2 weeks. If this reflects
>uteroplacental dysfuncton then shouldn't a normal UA Doppler be reassuring? We
>haven't done any tests of lung matuirity but we have just given her steroids
>without too much effect on her glucoses. Any hard facts on steroids at this
>gestation in diabetics? Fetal activity, CTG/NST's and BPP have been normal and
>there is no evidence of PIH in this 28y prim. I wonder if we're doing the right
>thing but am accepting the opinion of those more experienced in this situation.
>

1 Without any real evidence of fetal compromise and with near certainty of significant RDS ( and other maternal and fetal morbidity ) on one hand and various options for fetal assessment and monitoring this seems decidedly heavy handed.

2 There is evidence that steroids don't work so well in diabetics.

3 Diabetics ( babies of ) are more prone to RDS than non-diabetics at similar gestation.

4 Babes delivered by elective CS pre-labour at this gestation are very much more likely to have respiratory problems ( RDS/wet lungs/tachypnoea ).

5 I've seen a few diabetics with falling insulin requirements at this stage. The way we managed them was to give them less insulin ! The idea that falling insulin requirements indicates failing placental function seems to be just anecdote.

Personally I'd only do a CS in a diabetic with a clear indication before 38 weeks. I always give steroids ( at any gestation ) to my diabetics prior to pre-labour CS.

--
Malcolm Griffiths               MD,MRCOG,MFFP,Cert.Mgmnt
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist    Luton & Dunstable Hosp.,UK.
Tel:    01582-497459 (office)
        01525-222849 (home)
Fax:    01582-497424
email:  Malcolm@mgriff22.demon.co.uk

"It is dangerous to be right on a subject on which the established authorities are wrong." (Voltaire)





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:17:48 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.