Re: 35w diabetic needing less insulin

From: Paul Prior MD (pprior@fast.net)
Sun Mar 24 16:59:29 1996


On Sun, 24 Mar 1996 16:34:11 -0600 (CST), you wrote:

>Tomorrow we are delivering (by C/S) a 35w diabetic mainly on the grounds that
>her insulin requirements have halved over the last 2 weeks. If this reflects
>uteroplacental dysfuncton then shouldn't a normal UA Doppler be reassuring? We
>haven't done any tests of lung matuirity but we have just given her steroids
>without too much effect on her glucoses. Any hard facts on steroids at this
>gestation in diabetics? Fetal activity, CTG/NST's and BPP have been normal and
>there is no evidence of PIH in this 28y prim. I wonder if we're doing the right
>thing but am accepting the opinion of those more experienced in this situation.

Wow. Has there been any non-reassuring fetal testing? What data are you using to support the decision to section for decreasing insulin requirements?

--
Paul Prior MD   prior@fast.net      Home deliveries:
PGY-II Ob/Gyn                          ok for pizzas
TRHMC-Reading, PA                        not for babies




use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:17:48 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.