|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Internal herniayFrom: Eugene S. Jursek (ejursek@riker.neoucom.edu)Sat Dec 23 19:22:33 1995
...it was much simpler to take it out????It does make one think, doesn't it? Perhaps the approach should have been rethought. I have grave misgivings about removing a normal organ because of convenience. MO. > >>Interesting case, and the photo's really are worth a 1000 words. Question: Would it have been possible to correct the deficit without removing the ovary and tube. It may not have been an issue in her but it might be in another case. Could it have been oversewn?
>We were considering using an endoscopic suturing device to close the peritoneum, however, it was much simpler to just to take it out.. (took 5 minutes..). I suppose that re-approximating the braod ligament would work, but the hardiness of the repair would, in my opinion, be in doubt.
>Geffrey H. Klein, MD
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:58:16 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.