![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: C/sections & litigationFrom: mdecker@hcsinc.comFri Dec 22 19:45:58 1995
one attending doc in milwaukee successfully sued for c-section for breech..<lied to mother after c-section when he discovered infant was vertex>..lost but award not huge. fyi
On Fri, 22 Dec 1995, jason.gardosi@nottingham.ac.uk (Jason Gardosi) wrote:
>Ashley Hill, 22 Dec 1995:
>I agree.
>BTW, I would be interested to know - have there been (m)any successful prosecutions for 'unnecessary c/sections'?. My impression is that in places with high section rates, there is a heavy bias towards intervention, in great part because nobody has yet had to worry about litigation for performing unnecessary procedures per se (i.e. unless complications develop). Comments appreciated!
>jason.gardosi@nottingham.ac.uk
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Tue Dec 2 04:58:16 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.