![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: U/S and cervical incompetanceFrom: DoctorJoe@aol.comTue Dec 19 07:44:34 1995
Rudo Straka posted << We have a policy not to risk any pregnancy. It's better to do some apparently unnecessary cerclages /and it's questionable if they are really unnecessary/, than to lose one baby. I agree, that any patient is individual, but not absolutely different. So it's obviously necessary to decide individualy, but some standardisation is not only "conditio sine qua non" but also possible. The protocol regarding cervical incompetency is possible to build-up either for hospitals where money have strong controlling power, or for hospitals, where some independancy in health care is stabled.>> Gee... I guess us Slovaks think alike. ************************************************* doctorjoe@aol.com "All things are connected. Joseph Pastorek, MD Some things are just more Department of OB-GYN connected than others." LSU Medical Center - Dirk Gently New Orleans, LA U.S.A. *************************************************
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:17:04 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.