-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question. From: Raymond, Steve (Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au) Tue Jun 30 18:20:36 2009 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Gerald P. Rodríguez: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Previous message: Allan: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." In reply to: Allan: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Next in thread: Gerald P. Rodríguez: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Reply: Gerald P. Rodríguez: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Just the question I wanted to ask. What would be the mechanism for a retinal detachment in 2nd stage of labour that would be peculiar to that, as distinct from all the "normal" things like coughing, sneezing, straining at stool? Or even laughing? I am quite sceptical about this "old nanny" prohibition on labour. Sounds like an old wives' tale to me. Steve Raymond Ph (03)62227898 Cell 0438372395 ________________________________ From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Allan -- ________________________________ Sent: Wednesday, 1 July 2009 9:13 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question. Sorry to ask this stupid question - what do these patients do when they get constipated?! Allan CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose. Next message: Gerald P. Rodríguez: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Previous message: Allan: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." In reply to: Allan: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Next in thread: Gerald P. Rodríguez: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Reply: Gerald P. Rodríguez: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question."

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:15:05 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.