-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question. From: Henry Gregor (henrygregor@yahoo.com) Tue Jun 30 16:32:31 2009 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Maybe in reply to: emilio porro: "eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Next in thread: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Reply: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Robert, I agree with Emilio...my two cents, but I and many  others I'm sure, have seen numerous ocular petecchiae....not worth the issue of remotely having to deal with a deposition for one of the members of the plaintiff's bar, should something go wrong...and as with that procedure whose name must not be mentioned...you know, the one involving vaginal delivery in lieu of planned operative, no matter now comprehensive the informed consent is beforehand, after the fact of an adverse outcome its not likely worth the paper it's printed on.   Hank --- On Tue, 6/30/09, emilio porro <sanbonav@hotmail.com> wrote: From: emilio porro <sanbonav@hotmail.com> Subject: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question. To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Tuesday, June 30, 2009, 8:18 AM #yiv1715672565 .hmmessage P { margin:0px;padding:0px;} #yiv1715672565 { font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;} I agree.I think is common clinical experience to see some women after pushing for birth with eye anterior hemorragy or hemorragic eye's petecchias. Emilio Porro M.D   > Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:21:17 -0500 > From: eramirezt@coqui.net > To: ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net > Subject: Re: To push or not to push. That is the question. > > Elective C/S > > Ef > > At Mon, 29 Jun 2009, rmodugno@aol.com wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: rmodugno@aol.com > >To: ob-gyn-l@ob-gyn.net > >Sent: Mon, Jun 29, 2009 3:44 pm > >Subject: To push or not to push. That is the question. > > > >24 year old P0G1 - 21 weeks.Gives history of eye surgery in Ukaraine at > >age 14 Details are not available.Was told at the time not to be > >involved in anything that might involve jumping, horse back riding or > >"giving birth naturally", presumably due to stresses/strain within the > >eye due to her high myopia- this info from her local opthalmologist. At > >present retinal exam is normal.He advised: that "normal' physical > >activity should not cause any particular risk other  than the fact of > >her high myopia and increased risk of retinal detachment. Ofcourse he > >does not give any recommendations regarding delivery. > > > >  > > > >She wants to know whether she should have an elective cesarean section. > >What would YOU cyberobs do? > > > >  > > > >Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG > > > >Sylva, NC > > > > Save energy, paper and money -- get the Green Toolbar. > > -- > "Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans."- John Lennon Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. Check it out! Next message: Joanne Bulley, MD: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Previous message: art fougner, md: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Maybe in reply to: emilio porro: "eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Next in thread: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question." Reply: Bernard Cristalli: "Re: eye hemorragy was to push or not to push. That is the question."

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:14:20 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.