-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

fetal PAC's From: Charlie Chambers (ricechaz@me.com) Fri Apr 24 08:59:53 2009 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: fetal PAC's" Previous message: Charlie Chambers: "fetal PAC's" >From nobody@medispecialty.com Fri Apr 24 08:59:50 2009 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.obgyn.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/dsb-1.1) id n3ODxo817260 for OB-GYN-L@OBGYN.net; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:59:50 -0500 Message-Id: <200904241359.n3ODxo817260@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:59:50 -0500 (CDT) Errors-To: postmaster@medispecialty.com Reply-To: evsono@pipeline.com From: evsono@pipeline.com (art fougner, md) To: OB-GYN-L@OBGYN.net In-Reply-To: <SNT108-W77BDE244FD9C4A3F69ECE3DC720@phx.gbl> X-Original-Sender: @ 140.239.228.50 Subject: Re: BPP 2 and reassuring tracing And the flip side? Reassuring tracing, lousy apgars and Law Suit. Art At Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Andrew Folley wrote: > >Sounds like respiratory acidosis. Depends on the base excess level and PCO2 . Sudden change in tracing and emergency c-section with good apgars and low pH suggest respiratory acidosis??? > >> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:59:48 -0500 >> From: rmodugno@aol.com >> To: ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net >> Subject: Re: BPP 2 and reassuring tracing >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Glen Elrod <dr99645@yahoo.com> >> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> >> Sent: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 2:26 pm >> Subject: Re: BPP 2 and reassuring tracing >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Glen Elrod <dr99645@yahoo.com> >> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> >> Sent: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 2:26 pm >> Subject: Re: BPP 2 and reassuring tracing >> >> I had this exact scenario with a labor nurse pt not too long ago. Only >> points were for AFI. Sent to L&D and tracing was reactive on admission >> (hadn't been in the office). Pt had labor stimulated (didn't >> necessarily want pit so we used the breast pumps) and she managed to >> progress to 8cm before all hell broke loose on the strip and then at >> section Apgars were 8/9. Cord ph was 7.2. Go figure. >> >> Glen >> >> ********************************************* >> Hey Glen=2C three questions: >>=20 > >> 1) what category is "all hell broke loose" ? 2) What was the patient's >> objection to pitocin? and 3) how would you control hyperstimulation >> secondary to a breast pump? >> >> Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG >> Sylva, NC >> >Mobile2_042009 -- art fougner, md "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton Next message: R. Daniel Braun: "Re: fetal PAC's" Previous message: Charlie Chambers: "fetal PAC's"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:14:22 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.