Re: OOB: Meta-analysis of tocolysis FRI

From: R. Daniel Braun (rd.braun@gmail.com)
Wed Apr 22 15:14:18 2009


--0015175cd02aad0bfa04682a67c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The members of the Department of Gastroenterology that were involved were the PhD infomatics people.

Dan

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, art fougner, md <evsono@pipeline.com>wrote:

> Does the involvement of the Dept of Gastroenterology mean some found the
> conclusions hard to swallow?
>
> Art
>
> At Wed, 22 Apr 2009, DoctorJoe@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >Interesting study.
> >
> >Tocolytic therapy: a meta-analysis and decision analysis.
> >
> >Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113(3):585-94
> >
> >OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal first-line tocolytic agent for
> >treatment of premature labor.
> >
> >METHODS: We performed a quantitative analysis of randomized controlled
> >trials of tocolysis, extracting data on maternal and neonatal outcomes,
> and
> >pooling rates for each outcome across trials by treatment. Outcomes were
> delay
> >of delivery for 48 hours, 7 days, and until 37 weeks; adverse effects
> causing
> >discontinuation of therapy; absence of respiratory distress syndrome; and
> >neonatal survival. We used weighted proportions from a random-effects
> >meta-analysis in a decision model to determine the optimal first-line
> tocolytic
> >therapy. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the standard errors of
> the
> >weighted proportions.
> >
> >RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. A
> >random-effects meta-analysis showed that all tocolytic agents were
> superior to placebo
> >or control groups at delaying delivery both for at least 48 hours (53% for
> >placebo compared with 75-93% for tocolytics) and 7 days (39% for placebo
> >compared with 61-78% for tocolytics). No statistically significant
> differences
> >were found for the other outcomes, including the neonatal outcomes of
> >respiratory distress and neonatal survival. The decision model
> demonstrated that
> >prostaglandin inhibitors provided the best combination of tolerance and
> >delayed delivery. In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 women receiving
> prostaglandin
> >inhibitors, only 80 would deliver within 48 hours, compared with 182 for
> >the next-best treatment.
> >
> >CONCLUSION: Although all current tocolytic agents were superior to no
> >treatment at delaying delivery for both 48 hours and 7 days, prostaglandin
> >inhibitors were superior to the other agents and may be considered the
> optimal
> >first-line agent before 32 weeks of gestation to delay delivery.
> >
> >Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gastroenterology,
> >Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
> >
> >Joe P.
> >
> >web. Get the Radio Toolbar!
> >(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)
>
> --
> art fougner, md
> "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton
>

--
R. Daniel Braun, MD  FACOG(L)  ABMP  CMTh
Professor Emeritus
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Indiana U. School of Medicine

--
R. Daniel Braun

“Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND" Einstein 1941

--0015175cd02aad0bfa04682a67c1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The members of the Department of Gastroenterology that were involved were the PhD infomatics people.<br><br>Dan<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, art fougner, md <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:evsono@pipeline.com">evsono@pipeline.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Does the involvement of the Dept of Gastroenterology mean some found the<br> conclusions hard to swallow?<br> <br> Art<br> <br> At Wed, 22 Apr 2009, <a href="mailto:DoctorJoe@aol.com">DoctorJoe@aol.com</a> wrote:<br> ><br> >Interesting study.<br> ><br> >Tocolytic therapy: a meta-analysis and decision analysis.<br> ><br> >Obstet Gynecol.  2009; 113(3):585-94<br> ><br> >OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal first-line tocolytic agent for<br> >treatment of premature labor.<br> ><br> >METHODS: We performed a quantitative analysis of randomized controlled<br> >trials of tocolysis, extracting data on maternal and neonatal outcomes, and<br> >pooling rates for each outcome across trials by treatment. Outcomes were delay<br> >of delivery for 48 hours, 7 days, and until 37 weeks; adverse effects causing<br> >discontinuation of therapy; absence of respiratory distress syndrome; and<br> >neonatal survival. We used weighted proportions from a random-effects<br> >meta-analysis in a decision model to determine the optimal first-line tocolytic<br> >therapy. Sensitivity analysis was performed using the standard errors of the<br> >weighted proportions.<br> ><br> >RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. A<br> >random-effects meta-analysis showed that all tocolytic agents were superior to placebo<br> >or control groups at delaying delivery both for at least 48 hours (53% for<br> >placebo compared with 75-93% for tocolytics) and 7 days (39% for placebo<br> >compared with 61-78% for tocolytics). No statistically significant differences<br> >were found for the other outcomes, including the neonatal outcomes of<br> >respiratory distress and neonatal survival. The decision model demonstrated that<br> >prostaglandin inhibitors provided the best combination of tolerance and<br> >delayed delivery. In a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 women receiving prostaglandin<br> >inhibitors, only 80 would deliver within 48 hours, compared with 182 for<br> >the next-best treatment.<br> ><br> >CONCLUSION: Although all current tocolytic agents were superior to no<br> >treatment at delaying delivery for both 48 hours and 7 days, prostaglandin<br> >inhibitors were superior to the other agents and may be considered the optimal<br> >first-line agent before 32 weeks of gestation to delay delivery.<br> ><br> >Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gastroenterology,<br> >Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.<br> ><br> >Joe P.<br> ><br> >web. Get the Radio Toolbar!<br> >(<a href="http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003" target="_blank">http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003</a>)<br> <font color="#888888"><br> --<br> art fougner, md<br> &quot;May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather.&quot; - Jack Burton<br> </font></blockquote></div><br>

MD  FACOG(L)  ABMP  CMTh<br>Professor Emeritus<br>Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology<br>Indiana U. School of Medicine<br><br><br>R. Daniel Braun<br> <br>       “Science without Religion is LAME; Religion without Science is BLIND&quot;<br>                        Einstein 1941<br>

--0015175cd02aad0bfa04682a67c1--





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:13:37 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.