Re: VBAC dying art>

From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse (el@lisse.NA)
Tue Mar 31 02:48:13 2009


Hugo,

You are missing the point.

It's the ones that go wrong, that you need to make a plan for, not the ones that go right. And I don't mean that in a medico-legal sense, purely from anticipation of and preparedness for disasters.

The US malpractice lawyers only add flavor to the cake.

Again, if I could do the 17 minutes, I would consider VABCs and I have been even more hands-off when I still did.

el

Hugo D Ribot Jr wrote:

> I feel that as long as several guidelines are adhered to:
>
> - avoid induction of labor (other than AROM in someone with a huge
> Bishop score already contracting)
> - avoid usage of prostaglandin agents
> - limit use (and dosage) of oxytocin for augmentation to patients
> already in true labor with a soft, nearly fully effaced cervix at least
> 3-4 cms
> - avoid trial of labor with any prior vertical uterine incisions
>
> then VBACs are extremely safe and have a 80+% success rate. At least in
> my 19 year experience.





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Wed Dec 2 05:13:30 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.