Re: Rhogam

From: rmodugno@aol.com
Sat Feb 28 12:50:30 2009


You are correct, chai-wallah!(from what movie?)

Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG

Sylva, NC

-----Original Message-----

From: Gerald P. Rodríguez <geraldpr@cybermesa.com>

To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net>

Sent: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 2:32 pm

Subject: Re: Rhogam

A Drew-Smythe catheter is a thin catheter that is used when a high amniotomy (hind-water) is indicated. I never used one. 

 

See: http://books.google.com/books?id=58gMbC__GdMC&pg=PA160&lpg=PA160&dq=drew+smyth+catheter&source=bl&ots=eyxsAGNkoK&sig=-kBMwUIRzzR0J7n_lMUeXsHd-Ds&hl=en&ats=eyxsAGNkoK&sig=-kBMwUIRzzR0J7n_lMUeXsHd-Ds&hl=en&ei=5Y6pSYy7LNLjtger-73VDw&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum&ct=result#PPA158,M1 

 

Gerald P. Rodríguez, M.D., FACOG 

Santa Fe 

 

> ----- Original Message ----- From: <rmodugno@aol.com> 

To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> 

Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:27 AM 

Subject: Re: Rhogam 

 

> Talking about polyhydramnios, does anyone know what a Drew-Smyth catheter > is (Quiz), or has anyone ever used one? 

> 

> Robert Modugno MD MBA FACOG 

> Sylva, NC 

> 

> -----Original Message----- 

> From: Glen Elrod <dr99645@yahoo.com>  0A > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> 

> Sent: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 7:30 pm 

> Subject: Re: Rhogam 

> 

> AFI of 37, bilateral hydronephrosis with right ureteral obstruction. 

> 

> The local midwives really didn't feel comfortable doing this delivery. > Their regs say they need to consult with an MD for poly. I brought her in > for amniotomy with needle. 

> 

> I've been (ready for flames) been thinking about water birth for a while, > since I've been watching a whole host of midwifery 'propaganda' movies > recently. We have a birth tub but no policy. She got in the tub for labor > and with the CDM help we had a water birth. That situation totally flies > in the face of AWHONN standards and protocols. 

> 

> Glen 

> 

> 

> 

> From: Richard Chudacoff <rchudacoff@mylinuxisp.com> 

> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> 

> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 2:54:27 PM 

> Subject: RE: Rhogam 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>  0A > 

> 

> 

> 

> Home delivery? Why did she come to see you at all? 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> Richard Chudacoff, MD, FACOG 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net 

> [mailto:ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net] On Behalf Of Glen El 

> rod 

> 

> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 3:36 PM 

> 

> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L 

> 

> Subject: Re: Rhogam 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> Transfusion was the only thing I 

> could come up with. but the liklihood is so low. 

> 

> 

> 

> Why the objection? Probably the same reason she objected to fetal 

> monitoring, pit, vit K, eye ointment, etc etc etc. 

> 

> 

> 

> Glen 

> 

>  0A > 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> From: "art fougner, md"<evsono@pipeline.com> 

> 

> To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> 

> 

> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:59:12 PM 

> 

> Subject: Re: Rhogam 

> 

> 

> 

> Oh transfusion reaction down the road, difficulties if a transplant 

> 

> needed ... what exactly is her objection? 

> 

> 

> 

> Art 

> 

> 

> 

> At Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Glen Elrod wrote: 

> 

> > 

> 

> >Pt today is s/p delivery and is refusing Rhogam. Baby was Rh +, but 

> they are certain they are done having kids. He is having a 

> vasectomy. She states she will not have other children even if her 

> children die, husband dies, etc. 

> 

> > 

> 

> >Is there any NON-pregnancy risk to not20getting Rhogam now? 

> 

> > 

> 

> >Glen 

> 

> 

> 

> -- 

> 

> art fougner, md 

> 

> "May The Wings of Liberty Never Lose a Feather." - Jack Burton 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

>





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:14:08 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.