|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic GynecologyFrom: kamala nag (kamainvent@yahoo.com)Fri Aug 29 12:56:22 2008
Dear Dr. Raymond Stephen, It is a vast subject matter that I have started with this pages of my website. I have already proved my unique claims clinically & scientifically, that have been acknowledged by academic conferences/federal agencies/patients/companies like 23 prestgious resources. Federal agencies cannot allow further comparative study unless the invented knowledge can be transfered to one authority. You have all answers in the webcontent. Thank you. --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Raymond Stephen <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> wrote: From: Raymond Stephen <Stephen.Raymond@dhhs.tas.gov.au> Subject: Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 3:31 PM I repeat my original comments – prove that this device is superior to others, by doing the scientific study. Steve Raymond Ph (03)62227898 Cell 0438372395 From: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net [mailto: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net ] On Behalf Of kamala nag Sent: Friday, 29 August 2008 4:53 AM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission. If the transmission contains advice, the advice is based on instructions in relation to, and is provided to the addressee in connection with, the matter mentioned above. Responsibility is not accepted for reliance upon it by any other person or for any other purpose.
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:12:25 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.