![]() |
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic GynecologyFrom: kamala nag (kamainvent@yahoo.com)Thu Aug 28 16:02:00 2008
Thank you for your reply. Please find scientific references in problem page of my website http://www.geneticpeace.com I would be happy to answer your specific question. Thank you. --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Charlie Chambers <ricechaz@me.com> wrote: From: Charlie Chambers <ricechaz@me.com> Subject: Re: serious scientific controversial issue in basic Gynecology To: "Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L" <ob-gyn-l@mail.obgyn.net> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 12:08 PM Could you please provide the science, i.e. literature that supports the theories that you espouse? thx ************************************************************************* Charlie Chambers Hood River, OR -- cchamber@alumni.rice.edu
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:12:25 2009 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.