|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
Re: vbac on demandFrom: Dr. John Provatopoulos B.Sc. M.D.C.M. F.R.S.C. (johnprov@sympatico.ca)Fri May 23 06:35:12 2008
At Fri, 23 May 2008, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote: > >> No, she didn't :-)-O >> >> On May 23, 2008, at 02:59, Efrain Ramirez wrote: >> >>> You missed the central, fundamental issue of the discussion.. >>> >>> Ef >>> >>>> At Wed, 21 May 2008, Jamie wrote: >>>> >>>> What are the statistics for an unaugmented VBA2C vs a third c/s? >>> The statistics are more complicted than most mother's are made aware of IMHO. Overall repeat c-section is always safer for baby. A Mom will have an easier recovery after a successfull unaugmented VBAC2, but even an unaugmented unsuccessfull VBAC will carry a higher morbidity to Mom than an elective repeat. If we could predict which Mom's would have the easy VBAC than it would be easy, yes I am aware of all the predictive scoring methods and overall I am not to impressed with them.
--
Take care, John
|
|
Return to
|
Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Wed Jul 2 04:49:27 2008 |
The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.